SEAT vs. IGT, PRKS, FUN, SIX, RSI, SGHC, FBYD, MSGE, GENI, and GDEN
Should you be buying Vivid Seats stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Vivid Seats include International Game Technology (IGT), United Parks & Resorts (PRKS), Cedar Fair (FUN), Six Flags Entertainment (SIX), Rush Street Interactive (RSI), Super Group (SGHC), Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD), Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE), Genius Sports (GENI), and Golden Entertainment (GDEN). These companies are all part of the "miscellaneous amusement & recreation services" industry.
Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and International Game Technology (NYSE:IGT) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, community ranking, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.
39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.3% of International Game Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.2% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of International Game Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Vivid Seats presently has a consensus target price of $9.86, indicating a potential upside of 95.32%. International Game Technology has a consensus target price of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 41.84%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than International Game Technology.
International Game Technology received 492 more outperform votes than Vivid Seats when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 63.11% of users gave International Game Technology an outperform vote while only 41.82% of users gave Vivid Seats an outperform vote.
Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Game Technology has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500.
International Game Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Vivid Seats.
In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than International Game Technology. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Vivid Seats and 14 mentions for International Game Technology. International Game Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.37 indicating that International Game Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Vivid Seats has a net margin of 9.21% compared to International Game Technology's net margin of 4.98%. International Game Technology's return on equity of 20.84% beat Vivid Seats' return on equity.
Summary
International Game Technology beats Vivid Seats on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Vivid Seats News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SEAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Vivid Seats Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
